IN DEFENSE OF A-ROD?

If you know me, you know that I am not an Alex Rodriguez fan. I was one of those people who hoped that when he opted out of his contract at the end of the 2007 season that he was gone. But, he's not - and he is a Yankee - so I will hope for the best.

Having said that, the latest disclosure from Sports Illustrated has appalled me. How can a report that was confidential be released to a magazine? And how can a magazine print just one name? Will any pay for this?

Granted, A-Rod did use steroids - but it was during a time when they were not illegal. If you want to persecute the guy, he'll give you plenty of reasons, but this should not be one of them.

Sure, if you want to mention that many people had hoped that A-Rod was clean so that when he surpassed Barry Bonds' home run mark the asterisk issue would cease to exist. But, apparently it will remain in place.

So, tabloid writers, get your pens ready. A new season is on the horizon. And, I am sure A-Rod will do his share to help you sell newspapers, but for the time being, maybe the New York press can focus on the Knicks. Now, there's a topic worth attacking!!!

Here is an example of the New York press attacking A-Rod. Of course, as you can see, the New York Post leads the way: